{"id":"W4413079922","doi":"10.3982/te5799","title":"Anticomonotonicity for preference axioms: The natural counterpart to comonotonicity","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Axiom; Ambiguity; Mathematical economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Preference; Ambiguity aversion; Subjective expected utility; Variation (astronomy); Mathematics; Arbitrage; Risk aversion (psychology); Economics; Computer science; Financial economics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006854828,0.0004946311,0.0008611295,0.001093469,0.001607623,0.002454856,0.001201847,0.002046457,0.005172955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01923739,0.0004537232,0.001346128,0.001194625,0.008989089,0.007976777,0.002093492,0.004235777,0.0005502814],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001529941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001786634,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001524572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001329599,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994591,0.001942063,0.0006051285,0.001112049,0.001409048,0.0003407063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831204,0.00911951,0.001629091,0.002804837,0.002758133,0.0005680881],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003864401,0.000006794114,0.00008926935,0.00001327617,0.000003934067,0.00002187306,0.00006323453,0.0002586639,0.0001244564,0.9971015,0.0003098889,0.002003178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009172067,0.00001237044,0.0001454712,0.00001040771,0.000003812337,0.00007290003,0.00004160923,0.001885726,0.0001813804,0.9948227,0.002804342,0.00001016847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08873206,0.001279605,0.7829248,0.0098961,0.0004730787,0.0001289889,0.0005272678,0.0002425613,0.1157956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8744293,0.000748804,0.1169336,0.002164112,0.0005792481,0.0002082685,0.0002589228,0.00007926585,0.004598326],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006854828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03625226,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08505154140543643,"score_gpt":0.3991289766067753,"score_spread":0.3140774352013389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}