{"id":"W4413136471","doi":"10.1093/icesjms/fsaf141","title":"Avian vomitomics: using seabird regurgitations to assess forage fish size and age distributions as a complement to traditional survey methods","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICES Journal of Marine Science","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Cégep de Rimouski; Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Dental Foundation of Oregon","keywords":"Seabird; Forage; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Fishery; Complement (music); Forage fish; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology; Geography; Predation","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002064119,0.0006898876,0.000365199,0.002114221,0.0002566059,0.001166155,0.0005331392,0.0003256599,0.0006051011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002669572,0.0003512057,0.0004961374,0.000791994,0.0002762369,0.0008117479,0.0008431929,0.0003241684,0.0003467876],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004490951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004346964,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01224289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04112386,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992205,0.0002876894,0.00004774395,0.0002834567,0.0001106178,0.0000499822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979772,0.000532099,0.000791121,0.0001948319,0.0003383702,0.0001663956],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008294122,0.00004334772,0.9636264,0.00006654137,0.0001840205,0.000035621,0.0001715827,0.002961163,0.003776243,0.0001426757,0.0003081005,0.02860135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009781181,0.0002959386,0.8976759,0.00008589928,0.0001349604,0.0002353745,0.0006217612,0.09588357,0.002702674,0.0005024417,0.001787665,0.00006399744],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.9600347,0.0005810315,0.03479486,0.000107946,0.00002797635,0.00007920501,0.002353571,0.0004180824,0.001602728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9624941,0.0001992693,0.03524309,0.00004446554,0.00002416788,0.000049079,0.001514546,0.00002821252,0.0004029205],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01224289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02434325,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09302743500482567,"score_gpt":0.3966586982826134,"score_spread":0.3036312632777877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}