{"id":"W4413140727","doi":"10.1038/s41467-025-62029-w","title":"A systemic risk assessment methodological framework for the global polycrisis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Nature Communications","topic":"Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"General Dynamics (Canada); Royal Roads University","funders":"Agencia Estatal de Investigación; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; European Commission; V. Kann Rasmussen Foundation","keywords":"Systemic risk; Computational biology; Computer science; Risk assessment; Biology; Economics; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07342356,0.003070443,0.002548327,0.01577528,0.002620431,0.01137627,0.005633825,0.004976739,0.004351225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0432869,0.0009968873,0.003521102,0.01242282,0.01638653,0.00960947,0.01102721,0.007810296,0.001122986],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01061296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02397002,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004250125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005487021,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9407368,0.04581089,0.003605483,0.002699889,0.006547963,0.0005990333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9555749,0.03211217,0.003562294,0.002436724,0.00569481,0.000619097],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008671289,0.00002316639,0.0003801861,0.002190998,0.0001421671,0.00008242875,0.001371077,0.004697239,0.0001307372,0.9584016,0.002938339,0.02963354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002173579,0.00003336578,0.0003417252,0.004843953,0.0001282214,0.0001445985,0.001449633,0.006963398,0.0001501172,0.9203687,0.065516,0.00003865947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001347473,0.04560426,0.8986987,0.02268497,0.0007064349,0.001994755,0.0004934802,0.0001535731,0.02831638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09902468,0.04608188,0.8365858,0.004409882,0.0009788761,0.00859484,0.0005306281,0.0001015896,0.003691711],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07342356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3883055,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0885451793130144,"score_gpt":0.4523144947305677,"score_spread":0.3637693154175533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}