{"id":"W4413246018","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.07.013","title":"Putting negotiation on a ‘principal-ed’ footing: A corpus-informed discourse analysis of person deixis in diplomatic debates","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Deixis; Negotiation; Principal (computer security); Linguistics; Discourse analysis; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006290126,0.0004076726,0.0004758478,0.005140265,0.0054412,0.007206696,0.00111547,0.001343672,0.003022413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01473371,0.000468108,0.0002870281,0.007229194,0.008128425,0.007759986,0.004249072,0.002374402,0.000320142],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00530309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002364732,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0147669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0214833,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994766,0.003774362,0.0001865923,0.0004369796,0.0005631203,0.0002729371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846368,0.0133135,0.0006389339,0.0005984226,0.0006287546,0.0001836341],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001893298,0.00005767435,0.005087876,0.0003126001,0.00001742072,0.000715776,0.8928019,0.0004659154,0.004097403,0.06466089,0.001575104,0.03001809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004393603,0.00005481407,0.02039291,0.0008063113,0.00003841393,0.0005529277,0.8076944,0.00509264,0.00688212,0.02612423,0.132239,0.00007834109],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9107772,0.002224303,0.02361213,0.002398745,0.0001563505,0.0002929227,0.001400459,0.0001046302,0.05903313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9830331,0.0006666218,0.01117043,0.0001399832,0.00003159922,0.0002480416,0.0009262855,0.0001103355,0.003673536],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0147669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03847677,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03805956976609867,"score_gpt":0.3377791611832958,"score_spread":0.2997195914171972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}