{"id":"W4413280037","doi":"10.1111/cars.70014","title":"Revisiting the Sectoral Cleavage in Canada: Evidence From the Canadian Election Studies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; McMaster University; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Left-wing politics; Public sector; Voting; Ideology; Private sector; Cleavage (geology); Political science; Democracy; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Political economy; Economics; Economic growth; Politics; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009088481,0.0003347397,0.0009047743,0.006304472,0.009756031,0.005073091,0.002451303,0.0009797683,0.007185694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02660858,0.00046873,0.0006649861,0.02152555,0.004431766,0.001628206,0.002723941,0.002159089,0.0004422838],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07246066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.127372,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9973812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998646,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9923534,0.0009707998,0.0003629247,0.0007371839,0.003156021,0.002419665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9625692,0.009002669,0.00710276,0.001861333,0.01618589,0.003278089],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003677626,0.0001419476,0.8029729,0.001016578,0.0003139623,0.0005716692,0.06145871,0.0003519246,0.0003309675,0.03054593,0.02662398,0.0753037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002766441,0.00002267835,0.9291875,0.0006018315,0.0001360321,0.00004541407,0.03256882,0.0003075947,0.0001555738,0.0009223766,0.0359785,0.00004609225],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8934675,0.02200573,0.000434204,0.01982674,0.0002157163,0.0001530194,0.005730889,0.00001653571,0.05814965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892509,0.00547104,0.000205643,0.001265416,0.00003793833,0.00001999564,0.0009602422,0.00001515093,0.002773656],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9275393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5257413,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1181539883388674,"score_gpt":0.3611513706794451,"score_spread":0.2429973823405777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}