{"id":"W4413452555","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.129025","title":"An integrative urban tree risk index as a novel framework for risk assessment: A case study of Montreal, Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Urban forestry & urban greening","topic":"Tree Root and Stability Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais; University of Waterloo; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Western Sydney University","keywords":"Index (typography); Urban forestry; Risk assessment; Tree (set theory); Environmental planning; Geography; Environmental resource management; Forestry; Regional science; Environmental science; Computer science; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009290915,0.0006684475,0.0003112039,0.001865548,0.004081201,0.001902239,0.001620093,0.0006361624,0.00244704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002179142,0.0001570554,0.0005004198,0.00375496,0.00122859,0.000554278,0.001093433,0.0006407116,0.0001599749],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04424279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02255334,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9936855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973764,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993211,0.0001612965,0.00001836998,0.00008429005,0.0001861022,0.0002289129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989551,0.000219379,0.0001056089,0.00004648049,0.0004355951,0.000237755],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003300993,0.000472128,0.7845244,0.0003708144,0.0003452147,0.01097159,0.01172679,0.04888751,0.00413462,0.01523982,0.01946008,0.1035369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005954491,0.0002225946,0.8193207,0.0003140566,0.0002200645,0.001091713,0.03845845,0.08135188,0.001247942,0.003147987,0.05433569,0.000229266],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9666268,0.001647371,0.006129592,0.001854177,0.00003108593,0.0004021543,0.003995856,0.0001051093,0.01920786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872399,0.0006930367,0.006014891,0.0001973733,0.00001082913,0.00005724439,0.001169489,0.0000378914,0.00457937],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04424279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3210053,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009772811243806639,"score_gpt":0.2646584522513026,"score_spread":0.2548856410074959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}