{"id":"W4413452555","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.129025","title":"An integrative urban tree risk index as a novel framework for risk assessment: A case study of Montreal, Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Urban forestry & urban greening","topic":"Tree Root and Stability Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais; University of Waterloo; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Western Sydney University","keywords":"Index (typography); Urban forestry; Risk assessment; Tree (set theory); Environmental planning; Geography; Environmental resource management; Forestry; Regional science; Environmental science; Computer science; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003166085,0.0006159931,0.0008703326,0.0002697817,0.0005339187,0.00008670044,0.0004494913,0.0002367314,0.00001023277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004106924,0.0005762076,0.0002031372,0.0006881154,0.0001147219,0.000270931,0.0001135179,0.0009972551,3.963954e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004453253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003541048,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6646235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9794636,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997314,0.0001227914,0.0008284447,0.0006654779,0.0004013881,0.0006679359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974097,0.0009720984,0.0002860877,0.0008991599,0.0002216021,0.0002113282],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001252572,0.0003959298,0.9713311,0.0001188428,0.001045747,0.0001507635,0.008743445,0.006299556,0.000009889307,0.0005575912,0.005475124,0.005746784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003610628,0.00130937,0.8156818,0.0003562287,0.000873827,0.00003402212,0.04799372,0.1261726,0.00007562643,0.002099014,0.0009085186,0.0008846603],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9310653,0.0008080369,0.06480284,0.00002053666,0.0004356058,0.001225666,0.0005029755,0.00024889,0.0008901919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962237,0.000008422197,0.002982084,0.00001374767,0.0001877527,0.0002994972,0.00002715352,0.00007750855,0.0001801658],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3148401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999669,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009772811243806639,"score_gpt":0.2646584522513026,"score_spread":0.2548856410074959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}