{"id":"W4413799784","doi":"10.20944/preprints202508.1940.v1","title":"Analysis of Electro-Thermal De-Icing on a NACA0012 Airfoil Under Harsh SLD Conditions and Different Angles of Attack","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Preprints.org","topic":"Icing and De-icing Technologies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Icing; Icing conditions; Airfoil; NACA airfoil; Angle of attack; Materials science; Mechanics; Supercooling; Thermal conduction; Environmental science; Thermal; Drag; Aerospace engineering; Meteorology; Lift-to-drag ratio; Aerodynamics; Composite material; Physics; Engineering; Reynolds number","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002539385,0.000359223,0.0008834816,0.0009395891,0.00006045909,0.00001202129,0.0003954297,0.000424674,0.00009197631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001347778,0.0003640824,0.0002928345,0.0004405052,0.0001445492,0.00003282019,0.0005829121,0.0007836318,0.000007383006],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000170555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005039951,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001924023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006155477,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983658,0.00004412744,0.0005473383,0.0004851183,0.0002149301,0.0003427262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984645,0.0002371566,0.0001950318,0.0009633752,0.00008591876,0.00005398435],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004434874,0.0001816864,0.4719662,0.001230029,0.004691579,0.000004610501,0.001030643,0.4735705,0.04287463,0.002160849,0.00007619945,0.002168772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001926618,0.00002417253,0.6001199,0.0005442406,0.00103653,0.000001071146,0.0001290186,0.01297825,0.38386,0.0008206695,0.00002077363,0.0002726964],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931488,0.0001161578,0.001551318,0.00008610074,0.000124644,0.0002101952,0.0001169522,0.0005414728,0.004104367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992025,0.0002509348,0.0001190674,0.00003078469,0.00001972778,0.00005434405,0.00005737134,0.00002961592,0.000235601],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4605922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998811,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07521258671673063,"score_gpt":0.3330056381512022,"score_spread":0.2577930514344715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}