{"id":"W4414018354","doi":"10.1017/s0008423925100383","title":"Negative Spotlight: Event-Driven Effects on Support for the Canadian Supreme Court","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Acadia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Event (particle physics); Law; Law and economics; Economics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00494053,0.0004539404,0.000687284,0.001639769,0.008796345,0.005409691,0.002531063,0.0014653,0.01638245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03800698,0.0003726524,0.0005034116,0.002844803,0.004058992,0.001798197,0.004090318,0.003065774,0.0006587756],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02610554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02914955,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9583915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96665,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945545,0.001191385,0.0001255746,0.00070489,0.002044847,0.001378772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9693465,0.01207135,0.006720308,0.001733198,0.005782228,0.00434643],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008299145,0.0008362398,0.9254064,0.00009860776,0.0001875574,0.0003293518,0.03861237,0.0006635144,0.0008789955,0.004700134,0.008749751,0.01870713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003456619,0.0000711249,0.975329,0.00004365053,0.00004706573,0.00001538238,0.0194454,0.0005423689,0.0001171826,0.0008056384,0.003503095,0.00004549195],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9765087,0.0001877683,0.0001936785,0.001916673,0.00003343648,0.00007866771,0.001308913,0.0000164295,0.0197557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971316,0.00007748298,0.0001074924,0.0001950506,0.00001076618,0.00004320431,0.0004522853,0.000009916193,0.001972071],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04160851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1894098,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02164652032881181,"score_gpt":0.318430192653646,"score_spread":0.2967836723248342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}