{"id":"W4414288300","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5459414","title":"Nonprofit Organizations as Public Interest Litigants (2026) 104 Canadian Bar Review (forthcoming)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Public interest; Fiduciary; Subject (documents); Accountability; Intervention (counseling); Conflict of interest; Denial; State (computer science); Face (sociological concept)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001478128,0.0001229253,0.0001929665,0.0001956683,0.00267885,0.0001874315,0.0003659567,0.00008533063,0.0007540578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001021901,0.0001089444,0.00009812853,0.001308596,0.0001572343,0.0002773455,0.0000498086,0.0009185853,0.0001400773],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002192217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02292311,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05653262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8955426,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972057,0.0001534276,0.0002980505,0.0001778872,0.0002220816,0.001942863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988908,0.00004760532,0.00009817164,0.000156879,0.0005213855,0.0002852278],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[9.316287e-7,0.00001436996,0.002164882,0.00001673092,0.0001143626,0.00000479195,0.0003850124,4.613093e-7,0.000002172158,0.9771156,0.01407347,0.006107205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001756361,0.0000412894,0.0005235898,0.0003025756,0.00008319558,0.0000506807,0.005325865,0.000003127553,0.000003368888,0.06591539,0.9274108,0.0001644784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02702743,0.1476931,0.001109142,0.5555959,0.002060051,0.0009950876,0.00002513381,0.0001383033,0.2653559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8636774,0.109301,0.00001948783,0.002128331,0.000334188,0.0000079358,0.000009557881,0.00001354829,0.02450857],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9133373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986196,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01431341145254313,"score_gpt":0.3047593667249724,"score_spread":0.2904459552724293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}