{"id":"W4414306739","doi":"10.1101/2025.09.15.676165","title":"Personalized polygenic risk prediction and assessment with a Mixture-of-Experts framework","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"Data Analysis with R","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Alliance de recherche numérique du Canada; Canada First Research Excellence Fund; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Inference; Predictive modelling; Polygenic risk score; Quality (philosophy); Strengths and weaknesses; Personalized medicine; Representation (politics); Variety (cybernetics); Genetic variants","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007921917,0.0005808987,0.0008087669,0.0005102116,0.0001993836,0.0004262244,0.001429646,0.0005165375,0.00001661877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002033327,0.0005256793,0.000171513,0.001150247,0.0001979762,0.0003875956,0.001361241,0.001019538,0.000003252325],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002265295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001223387,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001462619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005144686,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996302,0.0003194581,0.0006189882,0.001533891,0.0007676486,0.0004579956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956563,0.0001985019,0.0007910188,0.002596166,0.000503335,0.0002547424],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004305881,0.002266221,0.7243267,0.004258972,0.0106734,0.000350716,0.0008729292,0.001180219,0.09363734,0.1569372,0.004719067,0.000346695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003726319,0.0006923774,0.8047232,0.006395677,0.002866461,2.300018e-7,0.00003320778,0.1129961,0.044269,0.0002165092,0.02020728,0.003873666],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1737322,0.003002738,0.8200092,0.0003739355,0.0008690957,0.0007654977,0.0007149578,0.0005055874,0.00002671215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7044421,0.0007897706,0.2942663,0.0001526101,0.0001365086,0.0001667541,6.878049e-7,0.00003602925,0.000009230444],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5307099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997195,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00898056053010192,"score_gpt":0.2378302793701405,"score_spread":0.2288497188400386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}