{"id":"W4414566604","doi":"10.1088/3033-4942/ae0c30","title":"Revisiting greenhouse gas accounting protocols: a case study on wastewater treatment in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Research Water","topic":"Environmental Policies and Emissions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Scope (computer science); Carbon accounting; Accounting method; Kyoto Protocol; Accounting information system","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01246027,0.0005661421,0.0003676835,0.002212652,0.009155692,0.005306773,0.002816811,0.001590479,0.001181464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02076131,0.0003877398,0.0008267739,0.006597783,0.002967471,0.00208398,0.00185458,0.002023565,0.0001717072],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1353097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1429048,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9858532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9885116,"domain_scores_codex":[0.985968,0.002668662,0.000578411,0.0008257974,0.007743262,0.00221579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9740857,0.00713043,0.001006134,0.001296443,0.01571319,0.000768143],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007784427,0.001126859,0.2417439,0.001765025,0.0003053258,0.01149495,0.03891903,0.1477343,0.01546186,0.0776949,0.02814431,0.4348311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002451926,0.001014913,0.2854495,0.001347155,0.0005607914,0.001493298,0.1538225,0.1680856,0.03432871,0.01230508,0.3402711,0.00107614],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.938574,0.001252732,0.01491042,0.005589932,0.00009513125,0.001609981,0.001648238,0.0003422567,0.03597743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9603772,0.001205149,0.025657,0.0006243904,0.00001358328,0.0001696441,0.001043633,0.0001050379,0.01080424],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1353097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9817451,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04406090898496557,"score_gpt":0.3417825851150562,"score_spread":0.2977216761300906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}