{"id":"W4414572156","doi":"10.1016/j.tfp.2025.101029","title":"Urban tree planning: Can MCDA-driven approaches help improve current practices? A Canadian case study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trees Forests and People","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal; Université de Montréal; HEC Montréal","funders":"Ministère de l'Économie, de la Science et de l'Innovation - Québec; Ministère de l'Économie, de l’Innovation et des Exportations du Québec","keywords":"Tree planting; Urban forestry; Tree (set theory); Urban forest; Ecosystem services; Urban planning; Set (abstract data type); Climate change","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001601418,0.0001779328,0.0002034133,0.0000755615,0.0003541936,0.0001241195,0.0001808239,0.00005338053,0.0001072333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001582916,0.0001338598,0.00003490959,0.0002229647,0.00001719813,0.0002051366,0.0001333819,0.0001225616,0.0000255202],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009738214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006587206,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6077748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962311,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988852,0.00005217694,0.0001869022,0.000386502,0.0001349131,0.0003542808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992749,0.0000554213,0.0001355501,0.0002758648,0.000005538214,0.0002527079],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001356701,0.0001277002,0.9854835,0.00004006305,0.00003107025,0.0002097051,0.006672909,0.0001714754,0.000002968696,0.00001897762,0.001862002,0.005366098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008382212,0.0002489939,0.9583839,0.00004103547,0.0001254678,0.0001221472,0.010347,0.01341683,0.00001012665,0.00006433458,0.01610548,0.0002964786],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947192,0.0003196903,0.000003838985,0.0003917986,0.0001923811,0.0004963528,0.00004026507,0.00002790452,0.003808558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994933,0.00001169277,0.00001598639,0.00005420035,0.00006238069,0.0000705615,0.00002003732,0.00001019946,0.0002616648],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3884563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5458645,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03447196756632356,"score_gpt":0.2721435539961163,"score_spread":0.2376715864297928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}