{"id":"W4414625223","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjo.2025.09.004","title":"The growing presence of AI-generated content in ophthalmology: a retrospective bibliographic analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Content analysis; Content (measure theory); MEDLINE; Scientific literature; Bibliometrics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01040081,0.0003636423,0.0007428161,0.03471867,0.0008901054,0.003411551,0.0008002385,0.000563901,0.002189185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06505357,0.0004253352,0.0009442816,0.03509658,0.0009380615,0.002318991,0.00152361,0.000414312,0.001073043],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001424849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002518046,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003700971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00367386,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9825212,0.003194461,0.006941081,0.001863961,0.004895955,0.0005833131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8458288,0.03690132,0.07990645,0.008500961,0.02583776,0.003024666],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001425916,0.00002528874,0.9849513,0.0009747531,0.0001912155,0.000228416,0.0005195877,0.0000691784,0.0004324456,0.0001092078,0.0009707449,0.01138522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007891812,0.00009219308,0.9916169,0.0003826791,0.0001652755,0.0009173133,0.000923572,0.0001505211,0.0005600671,0.00005684132,0.005107531,0.00001918985],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9445369,0.01943937,0.001452155,0.0006923865,0.00009461866,0.0004028419,0.02920892,0.0001667859,0.004006045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978748,0.006736047,0.002025953,0.0002213574,0.0002195286,0.0004223521,0.01072884,0.00004869602,0.0008492449],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9895992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05500537,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1245217818902519,"score_gpt":0.4036144781496349,"score_spread":0.2790926962593829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}