{"id":"W4414762459","doi":"10.5198/jtlu.2025.2294","title":"The application of rational inattention theory in modelling residential location choices: A cross-sectional investigation using a stated preference dataset","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Transport and Land Use","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Preference; Measure (data warehouse); Rational choice theory (criminology); Discrete choice; Rational analysis; Revealed preference; Rational planning model; Process (computing); Contrast (vision); Empirical research","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004211937,0.0003571291,0.0003839545,0.001148803,0.0005059507,0.0008433416,0.001028066,0.0009459461,0.002047785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01256975,0.000222035,0.0006547587,0.002360902,0.0003850897,0.0006938084,0.0006652974,0.001105173,0.0005205584],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001435458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005927998,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04072551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07588655,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985266,0.0009609592,0.0000872419,0.0001999901,0.0001260171,0.00009916358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827094,0.0114097,0.001889945,0.002449117,0.001150109,0.0003916744],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005585159,0.001444586,0.9133397,0.0001627923,0.0003564636,0.0004628849,0.001978927,0.04791133,0.0008242633,0.005795593,0.008226251,0.01893869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009548712,0.0006320631,0.6070313,0.00007195809,0.0001164682,0.0004777499,0.004094791,0.3709103,0.001283753,0.004616641,0.01057196,0.00009748649],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9874675,0.00007271481,0.004767958,0.000180076,0.000008343599,0.00008801196,0.006693535,0.0000282559,0.0006937444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9758905,0.00006602512,0.008129186,0.00005396969,0.00001024532,0.0001569752,0.01488475,0.00001240317,0.0007960872],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04072551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08097696,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1395753125608294,"score_gpt":0.2693527390433878,"score_spread":0.1297774264825584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}