{"id":"W4414774694","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2025-020866","title":"From positionality statements to reflexive statements of principle-informed process","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ Global Health","topic":"Social Science and Policy Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Equity (law); Process (computing); Economic Justice; Qualitative research; Social justice","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":{"n_in":1,"stratum":"aff_core","weight":5595.2375,"opus":{"tier":"T3","genre":"editorial/commentary","about_ca":false,"confidence":"low","reason":"Argues for moving from positionality statements to reflexive statements of principle-informed process in global health research outputs; the object is a research reporting and equity practice, but the payload is a single summary-box sentence and it reads as commentary/analysis rather than a study, so the T1/T3 line is genuinely uncertain."},"gpt":{"tier":"T1","genre":"conceptual","about_ca":false,"confidence":"high","reason":"The work examines how positionality and reflexive processes are reported in research outputs."},"grok":{"tier":"T3","genre":"editorial/commentary","about_ca":false,"confidence":"medium","reason":"Normative commentary on positionality statements in research outputs, not an empirical study of research systems."}}}