{"id":"W4414807889","doi":"10.1016/j.cor.2025.107264","title":"Mitigating choice model ambiguity: A consensus framework and its application to assortment optimization","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Operations Research","topic":"Supply Chain and Inventory Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ambiguity; Context (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Boosting (machine learning); Choice set; Quality (philosophy); Variety (cybernetics); Fraction (chemistry)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01553725,0.001801916,0.00285154,0.002477127,0.001234053,0.002218247,0.00243412,0.002495978,0.003649066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03981558,0.0007856562,0.002331653,0.001897289,0.003031428,0.003420434,0.003665601,0.003369018,0.000462071],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002218215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002957904,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004871734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002397002,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9919875,0.004924604,0.0002792613,0.001024127,0.001371447,0.0004130483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9752578,0.01819107,0.002044163,0.001329728,0.002375866,0.0008013117],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006001108,0.00005907343,0.0005641696,0.00007567151,0.00009809558,0.00006666242,0.00009884677,0.8810063,0.0004634004,0.09751708,0.0006276836,0.01936303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008615926,0.00003891327,0.00007403769,0.00001072171,0.00001001198,0.000008651198,0.00001376488,0.9532349,0.0001285324,0.04619933,0.0002609905,0.00001160264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.006931031,0.0001768165,0.9908552,0.0003783148,0.00002595451,0.00004438513,0.00003472554,0.00006522051,0.001488317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6371926,0.0008031499,0.3569644,0.0003323852,0.0002444181,0.0004406573,0.0002177779,0.0001368476,0.00366776],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01553725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08216977,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06008190328387202,"score_gpt":0.3544947405894256,"score_spread":0.2944128373055536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}