{"id":"W4414833970","doi":"10.29173/alr2840","title":"Selecting a Standard of Review: What Does This Entail Post-Vavilov?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Transparency (behavior); Duty; Citizenship; Selection (genetic algorithm); Process (computing)","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":{"n_in":0,"stratum":"venue_new","weight":2684.24666666667,"opus":{"tier":"OUT","genre":"conceptual","about_ca":false,"confidence":"high","reason":"Administrative law analysis of the judicial standard of review post-Vavilov; 'standard of review' is judicial, not peer review."},"gpt":{"tier":"OUT","genre":"conceptual","about_ca":false,"confidence":"high","reason":"The article analyzes administrative-law doctrine, not the research system."},"grok":{"tier":"OUT","genre":"conceptual","about_ca":false,"confidence":"high","reason":"Canadian administrative-law analysis of judicial review standards, not research evaluation or policy of science."}}}