{"id":"W4414926616","doi":"10.1017/rsm.2025.10041","title":"Making sense of conducting a critical interpretive synthesis: A scoping review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Synthesis Methods","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Data extraction; Process (computing); Systematic review; Consolidation (business); Quality (philosophy); Best practice","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01167649,0.0001912844,0.0006339822,0.0007593973,0.0004633618,0.0001808515,0.0003728016,0.00006368456,0.001243354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2157243,0.0001705469,0.0001373043,0.002031794,0.0003407545,0.0004732393,0.001060416,0.0002553457,0.00005581551],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007160661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007989342,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007207659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001360142,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970878,0.000823761,0.0005833855,0.0004415403,0.0005766962,0.000486833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9692502,0.02888436,0.0002016113,0.000450491,0.001196246,0.00001709492],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001851082,0.000391095,0.003246235,0.1933601,0.0008946364,0.00008202675,0.000265173,0.00001169046,0.007208092,0.5799639,0.02212904,0.1922629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001446247,0.00001969659,0.00106159,0.9292991,0.001051517,0.000005009958,0.004726094,0.002815812,0.02452803,0.02430657,0.0111451,0.0008968848],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001870829,0.1019052,0.2242631,0.02972958,0.001128056,0.004233,0.00001205214,0.0005143556,0.6363439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8603489,0.00527746,0.1291339,0.002989274,0.0007445157,0.0008237955,0.000001509367,0.00009129827,0.0005892973],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8584781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996697,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2885263093294941,"score_gpt":0.5377724213233885,"score_spread":0.2492461119938945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}