{"id":"W4415454568","doi":"10.54254/2755-2721/2025.28012","title":"Review of Yangtze River PFAS Treatments: A Comparison Between Activated Carbon, Reverse Osmosis, and Foam Fractionation in the Context of the Yangtze River","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Applied and Computational Engineering","topic":"Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Positive Living North","funders":"","keywords":"Yangtze river; Context (archaeology); Pollutant; Environmental remediation; Water pollutants; Aquatic ecosystem; Human health; Fractionation","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002440048,0.0001918095,0.0003257925,0.00008171942,0.00008637473,0.00001310307,0.0001464402,0.00008642104,0.00003972373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002361626,0.0001380202,0.00007050297,0.0005574367,0.0002631311,0.00008761496,0.00009909767,0.0001913566,0.000002268496],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001106638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000269612,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001874151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005648595,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987336,0.00005317694,0.0005040884,0.000245015,0.0003278334,0.0001363338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993267,0.0002305722,0.0002501803,0.0001294327,0.00002780482,0.00003528192],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005177666,0.002344131,0.1962288,0.01043914,0.002268205,0.000005557597,0.01925736,0.1297857,0.08849864,0.08731814,0.002814793,0.4605217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001815737,0.00005928068,0.9455377,0.002312022,0.00030188,0.000006514725,0.000730223,0.04085942,0.002490034,0.001094099,0.004510767,0.0002823542],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897828,0.00473088,0.001856141,0.001476522,0.0001283381,0.001085246,0.0001011945,0.00001700666,0.0008218492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975601,0.001476918,0.0003970313,0.0004661676,0.00001648554,0.00001512387,0.00002220367,0.000006827858,0.00003918577],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7493089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56283,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008715147107363984,"score_gpt":0.2317074751767519,"score_spread":0.2229923280693879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}