{"id":"W4415488869","doi":"10.5195/jmla.2025.2024","title":"Analyzing the citation impact of predatory journals in the health sciences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Citation impact; Bibliometrics; Citation analysis; Biomedical sciences; Human science; Impact factor","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01288716,0.0003446169,0.0007797338,0.02979583,0.00132241,0.004491159,0.0006853646,0.000867187,0.003084999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1352376,0.0001799067,0.0006772497,0.04476687,0.001130365,0.002826755,0.002160724,0.0005964493,0.0006277226],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002017773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00306456,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004396386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006090806,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9822604,0.004217702,0.002802529,0.001071909,0.009061912,0.0005854488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7556159,0.1376607,0.0709084,0.004960362,0.02656133,0.004293228],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001485923,0.00006688426,0.9438908,0.001723665,0.0004887418,0.000318213,0.001937628,0.0002457708,0.0006993609,0.001230458,0.002406896,0.04684297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001680954,0.0001422551,0.983223,0.0006574687,0.0004507981,0.0007557865,0.002170803,0.001143246,0.0008873699,0.001056449,0.009467247,0.00002882585],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9527429,0.02964306,0.001380873,0.002420967,0.0003453636,0.0001422497,0.002718015,0.00005958548,0.01054702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98935,0.006510266,0.00124277,0.0001697979,0.0004731691,0.00006098894,0.001090113,0.00002145663,0.001081359],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9991328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06815463,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3545117205238558,"score_gpt":0.5962054485031559,"score_spread":0.2416937279793001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}