{"id":"W4415488869","doi":"10.5195/jmla.2025.2024","title":"Analyzing the citation impact of predatory journals in the health sciences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Citation impact; Bibliometrics; Citation analysis; Biomedical sciences; Human science; Impact factor","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1282361,0.00007544205,0.0003164053,0.01208859,0.0004255431,0.001426085,0.004608341,0.00009885726,0.0004841276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1351364,0.00002582564,0.0004168484,0.1034504,0.0002009825,0.001307951,0.0003456502,0.000849087,0.000003381127],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000240927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002989357,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002894182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000513952,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9814297,0.003702215,0.001620487,0.0001520184,0.01276739,0.0003281815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9682972,0.02651099,0.003380249,0.0003910133,0.001201317,0.0002192322],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000171693,0.00009023077,0.8325753,0.000003068245,0.00004132626,0.000001724742,0.0003964857,0.0002219643,0.00001366509,0.0007813813,0.1386591,0.02719858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003295137,0.0001612982,0.9680702,0.0001017501,0.000006329089,0.000007264401,0.0008250229,0.002151608,0.00003432058,0.02401971,0.004262577,0.00003040193],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7763726,0.00506481,0.0008924669,0.2132246,0.001047019,0.0001995833,0.00001474149,0.000002949535,0.003181332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966071,0.0009214057,0.00008878492,0.001556873,0.0001565268,0.000001013141,2.590766e-7,0.000002381507,0.0006657107],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2202345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996105,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3545117205238558,"score_gpt":0.5962054485031559,"score_spread":0.2416937279793001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}