{"id":"W4415699443","doi":"10.15626/mp.2020.2643","title":"A Multi-faceted Mess: A Review of Statistical Power Analysis in Psychology Journal Articles","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Meta-Psychology","topic":"Psychometric Methodologies and Testing","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sample size determination; Statistical power; Sample (material); Power (physics); Identification (biology); A priori and a posteriori; Order (exchange)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04914304,0.0008301772,0.006470586,0.008634497,0.0002528507,0.0001829496,0.003305682,0.0007446437,0.02497615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1725473,0.0006042687,0.002092863,0.03374037,0.001344049,0.0002935338,0.0005277948,0.001892086,0.0001847166],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007631195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003497608,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000615627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006799946,"domain_scores_codex":[0.969979,0.01649867,0.007722181,0.002513368,0.001655506,0.001631202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9601957,0.03181493,0.002923715,0.003115198,0.00149824,0.0004522214],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001187766,0.00475889,0.1420352,0.0009413207,0.02969597,0.0007385132,0.0006139278,0.0001007374,0.002211496,0.001870848,0.08914176,0.7267036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005721979,0.001042615,0.8509552,0.00112498,0.01939992,0.0002852894,0.0003962886,0.001733708,0.00004832836,0.03823589,0.08018063,0.0008751069],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01241078,0.3186862,0.6416471,0.01557313,0.003615562,0.0007683611,0.00014808,0.00003831303,0.007112452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3586845,0.1443581,0.4541382,0.04150514,0.00009510526,0.0001412069,0.00001483041,0.0000613438,0.001001575],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7258285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996409,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5836364185346339,"score_gpt":0.5957669098937192,"score_spread":0.01213049135908528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}