{"id":"W4416193831","doi":"10.1093/ornithapp/duaf079","title":"Bias in density estimates from avian point-count surveys: Prospects for post-hoc corrections using calibration data","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ornithological applications","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Northwest Territories; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"SaskPower; TD Friends of the Environment Foundation; McLean Foundation","keywords":"Distance sampling; Estimation; Calibration; Sampling (signal processing); Regression; Regression analysis; Density estimation; Observational error; Abundance (ecology)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004528048,0.0001229067,0.0001625586,0.00004279922,0.0003657239,0.00003778921,0.0003574411,0.0001621983,0.0004759938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000218962,0.0001075606,0.00003029355,0.0003993163,0.0002442361,0.0002298971,0.0003058153,0.0001600289,0.0001217077],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001523987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002862048,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009921065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004363927,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988245,0.000105089,0.0002459549,0.0005357314,0.000075409,0.0002132818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998982,0.000371459,0.00007733388,0.0004986922,0.00002093397,0.00004962412],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001596216,0.0002874533,0.9923273,0.000002223267,0.00000368209,0.000001864806,0.00002617961,0.0001525313,0.003368726,0.00006815476,0.0002045123,0.003541371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020846,0.00003887774,0.9921027,0.000006345258,0.0000398124,0.000003500597,0.00007221829,0.001614621,0.0006155105,0.004721873,0.000456073,0.0001200151],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7846123,0.00001490029,0.213199,0.0005340827,0.00006923507,0.0009611036,0.0003220692,0.00007450266,0.0002128583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9679865,0.000004219528,0.02998114,0.0003572355,0.00002391885,0.0004791504,0.0009390197,0.00000759896,0.0002212631],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1833742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5211799,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07620126518138579,"score_gpt":0.3233128718565688,"score_spread":0.247111606675183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}