{"id":"W4416458942","doi":"10.5539/elt.v18n12p45","title":"Chinese EFL Graduate Students’ Academic Literacy Development: A Case Study","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"English Language Teaching","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Graduate students; Academic writing; Learning development; Qualitative research; Language proficiency; Focus (optics); English for academic purposes","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003862371,0.001224709,0.001417108,0.001214301,0.003913806,0.002611407,0.001565627,0.0002040629,0.001157259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002277288,0.001049283,0.0004587796,0.0004893768,0.000368935,0.001464035,0.001910533,0.003758891,0.0001081055],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003417419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001899199,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003145834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004886104,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9928302,0.001322158,0.001859694,0.001419895,0.001348554,0.00121955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968933,0.0007304001,0.0005563221,0.001275825,0.0003206522,0.0002234915],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003731858,0.001663252,0.02695478,0.0002211306,0.003243236,0.01168635,0.8744106,0.0000128332,0.000005449418,0.001592789,0.0006495271,0.07952274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002119496,0.0001166291,0.001431087,0.0007854492,0.001387566,0.00007207606,0.9822819,0.00006831383,0.00001129436,0.00006216374,0.01061137,0.001052641],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9178662,0.0149446,0.00007314816,0.0000793805,0.003182984,0.001255862,0.00004701129,0.0004891247,0.0620617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.955619,0.00007826125,0.0001933893,0.0004661239,0.00327337,0.000191346,0.00005293547,0.0001155517,0.04001001],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1078713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997558,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02315022244159659,"score_gpt":0.3698126484246235,"score_spread":0.3466624259830269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}