{"id":"W4416507868","doi":"10.1016/j.jnucmat.2025.156309","title":"Reassessment of Weibull failure analysis applied to SiC layers in coated particle fuels","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Nuclear Materials","topic":"Nuclear reactor physics and engineering","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Nuclear Laboratories","funders":"Idaho National Laboratory; Atomic Energy of Canada Limited; Canadian Nuclear Laboratories; North Carolina State University; Battelle","keywords":"Weibull distribution; Weibull modulus; Consistency (knowledge bases); Particle (ecology); Stress (linguistics); Failure mechanism; Test data","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002156154,0.000573565,0.0005020387,0.001800227,0.000634101,0.001288569,0.001184568,0.001124848,0.001601176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004378627,0.000296888,0.0009111671,0.0008869852,0.0006089273,0.0006786415,0.0004355878,0.0007009913,0.0004935166],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007097151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006035652,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008336425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01179611,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992908,0.0001513833,0.00005224394,0.00008407587,0.0003563855,0.00006491467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965975,0.001169382,0.0001716365,0.0007127544,0.001294125,0.0000546158],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001799473,0.0003021014,0.08747389,0.000568464,0.0004759071,0.001908893,0.001645966,0.3885548,0.2495953,0.006680833,0.00498066,0.2560138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001331481,0.000369116,0.06835716,0.00008315092,0.0001186899,0.0005665214,0.0004925239,0.8580164,0.06554575,0.001388529,0.004943132,0.0001057244],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9314849,0.0009909899,0.06022448,0.0003057228,0.0001564189,0.00006803148,0.0006731007,0.0007174812,0.005378757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910445,0.0001496888,0.007311107,0.00003143196,0.00001283457,0.00001132517,0.0001188351,0.00009092392,0.00122932],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008336425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01657581,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005054477514249986,"score_gpt":0.2130250933616486,"score_spread":0.2079706158473986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}