{"id":"W4416651229","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.oa.25.00230","title":"Revisiting the FAITH Trial: A Secondary Analysis Yielding Novel Insights with the Win Ratio","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JBJS Open Access","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Western University; Impact; University of Toronto; McMaster University","funders":"National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases; National Institute for Health and Care Research; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; National Institutes of Health; ZonMw; McMaster University","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Faith; Interpretation (philosophy); Intervention (counseling); Good faith; Yield (engineering)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1584622,0.002345337,0.005659855,0.001274064,0.0007283981,0.003663764,0.002706987,0.002349954,0.007831234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3517145,0.000613877,0.01084595,0.001620346,0.001923981,0.0038187,0.002361565,0.00437834,0.0008771076],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008976728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002268285,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008818692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009935024,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7045287,0.2661539,0.00983902,0.0089609,0.008481021,0.002036459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6928802,0.2567734,0.01739688,0.02555934,0.005992069,0.001398075],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.2856422,0.002087748,0.08960639,0.03577223,0.2053173,0.003211617,0.002621146,0.010642,0.00489543,0.05586317,0.06924134,0.2350994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.2353359,0.06649782,0.07509527,0.009249749,0.1901003,0.002881869,0.001954966,0.09969776,0.007267419,0.1842335,0.1266522,0.001033106],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.520238,0.05127031,0.2978407,0.04734816,0.01945456,0.02960003,0.01320561,0.002401084,0.01864147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9112164,0.001441903,0.05550148,0.01116668,0.003130145,0.0129079,0.002002853,0.0004178296,0.002214782],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1584622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8380383,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7085947861532406,"score_gpt":0.5870832099076173,"score_spread":0.1215115762456233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}