{"id":"W4417054817","doi":"10.1080/07038992.2025.2587489","title":"Evaluating landsat time series of above-ground biomass to monitor boreal forest recovery following different types of disturbance","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alliance de recherche numérique du Canada","keywords":"Taiga; Disturbance (geology); Biomass (ecology); Series (stratigraphy); Boreal; Time series; Field (mathematics); Vegetation (pathology)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000823412,0.0003721419,0.0001835331,0.001264671,0.0002164126,0.0004758888,0.000274104,0.0002394993,0.0004042228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001272514,0.0001006829,0.0002706734,0.001031744,0.0001576019,0.0004490647,0.0002054915,0.0001676238,0.0001420965],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005166356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003331682,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03723781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07938097,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999803,0.00003820161,0.00001804276,0.00005519814,0.00005709573,0.000028581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994531,0.0001069866,0.0001562004,0.00005560359,0.0001802826,0.00004778162],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003643247,0.0004209914,0.7752647,0.0000954425,0.0002275954,0.0002111069,0.0002018261,0.1167609,0.0189502,0.0003236671,0.001151423,0.08602765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008931041,0.0001012837,0.8021374,0.00001094606,0.00003490962,0.00006670397,0.000169767,0.1923258,0.004377986,0.000124827,0.0006228577,0.00001857037],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949437,0.00006044671,0.002853517,0.00002452935,0.000007443227,0.00001716467,0.001295153,0.0001139685,0.0006840869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927758,0.00003193051,0.004727421,0.000009153446,0.000004308178,0.00001665515,0.002191567,0.00001136316,0.0002318034],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03723781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07404214,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01257726046527006,"score_gpt":0.2549842075118235,"score_spread":0.2424069470465535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}