{"id":"W4417093904","doi":"10.1002/cl2.70080","title":"Reliability and Validity of Risk Assessment Tools for Violent Extremism: A Systematic Review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; Université du Québec à Montréal; Concordia University; Université de Montréal","funders":"Public Safety Canada","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Risk assessment; Risk management tools; Validity; German; Field (mathematics); Inclusion (mineral); Predictive validity","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02049378,0.0003437279,0.003419714,0.00007674548,0.0003315327,0.0001257335,0.000607355,0.0001609226,0.00003683653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03378285,0.0002309302,0.0005988503,0.000368458,0.0002493207,0.0002927663,0.00008549209,0.0001888243,0.00002197808],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003110338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002516476,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001808147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005593187,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9891781,0.006167599,0.003111309,0.0005314148,0.0005469652,0.0004646374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898033,0.006598174,0.001723515,0.001206038,0.0004562012,0.0002127994],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001655428,0.00006323635,0.0001537477,0.9934033,0.00004175651,4.284717e-7,0.003057971,1.258592e-7,0.000005823698,0.001861648,0.00104869,0.0003616073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002535927,0.0000594369,0.0001670158,0.9805626,0.002356321,0.000002291195,0.01146219,0.0001364592,0.000007665791,0.002196717,0.002495894,0.0002997708],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03175396,0.7222349,0.09857378,0.001827152,0.003158969,0.1346059,0.0003032928,0.0002603028,0.007281775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8271602,0.1647025,0.0004320189,0.0007806955,0.0001001204,0.006117033,0.000009358302,0.00001903721,0.0006790257],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7954062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.974356,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07806956353059008,"score_gpt":0.3980266079324008,"score_spread":0.3199570444018107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}