{"id":"W4417315573","doi":"10.26556/jesp.v30i7.3854","title":"Reframing Epistemic Partiality: A Case for Acceptance","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Rationality; Analogy; Philosophy of science; Doxastic logic; Cognition; Friendship; Dimension (graph theory)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002177728,0.0001245562,0.0003875545,0.00009133865,0.001254905,0.0001438202,0.0001218957,0.0002340912,0.0000127318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004231987,0.0001090541,0.0002374948,0.00003450569,0.0006599355,0.0001794123,0.00003440428,0.001210102,6.999005e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003306723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002008368,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005006292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002338012,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987887,0.0002249077,0.0005181857,0.0001285599,0.0001684553,0.0001711597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977262,0.001009704,0.0004119188,0.00008463764,0.000721293,0.00004626207],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006238261,0.00004427766,0.00002307925,0.0003746211,0.000127002,0.00005130292,0.05022031,4.922676e-7,0.00003620643,0.9465558,0.0007339708,0.001770558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000534697,0.0001105771,0.000009518134,0.0001082674,0.0001420979,0.00003781007,0.005833009,0.00001060379,0.00002661311,0.8722496,0.1208289,0.000108299],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3203347,0.008945849,0.005203584,0.5468675,0.01231209,0.00097092,0.0002801015,0.00008208547,0.1050031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910424,0.0001430102,0.000228415,0.004400785,0.003289713,0.00000534143,0.00000201431,0.00001200763,0.0008763442],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6707076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.965184,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1558482109168467,"score_gpt":0.3708129133351786,"score_spread":0.2149647024183319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}