{"id":"W4417315573","doi":"10.26556/jesp.v30i7.3854","title":"Reframing Epistemic Partiality: A Case for Acceptance","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Rationality; Analogy; Philosophy of science; Doxastic logic; Cognition; Friendship; Dimension (graph theory)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0153601,0.0005546059,0.0009765429,0.00151148,0.008562564,0.01180581,0.002378133,0.008953271,0.004875115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03798392,0.0006204383,0.001218374,0.001013686,0.05744175,0.02388321,0.01283821,0.0136755,0.0006852056],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003219952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002373909,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002330537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001501658,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9834479,0.008880305,0.0007081631,0.002115598,0.003035926,0.001812119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9738227,0.01501291,0.001861825,0.005253639,0.00265395,0.001395001],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002032678,0.00001391517,0.0004579376,0.0000233927,0.000008172898,0.0002700049,0.02025782,0.00008870095,0.0001826961,0.974472,0.0004967349,0.003708317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001772978,0.00002498431,0.0002749036,0.00005699788,0.00001526605,0.0002920696,0.006854782,0.0008024583,0.0002130005,0.9796832,0.01174304,0.00002161834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3166905,0.002363468,0.1708941,0.1346591,0.0007542789,0.0001398849,0.00006889543,0.0002946854,0.374135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993161,0.0001387334,0.002800802,0.001461373,0.0001375481,0.00004495787,0.00001039428,0.00004621702,0.002199022],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0153601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08123296,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1558482109168467,"score_gpt":0.3708129133351786,"score_spread":0.2149647024183319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}