{"id":"W4417434455","doi":"10.1038/s41612-025-01288-2","title":"Mass absorption cross-section of ambient black carbon aerosols - a review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"npj Climate and Atmospheric Science","topic":"Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme; Academy of Finland; European Commission; Government of Canada","keywords":"Carbon black; Aerosol; Soot; Absorption (acoustics); Mass concentration (chemistry); Sampling (signal processing); Range (aeronautics); Analytical Chemistry (journal)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007109772,0.0001653271,0.0002709218,0.000002792607,0.0002698262,0.0001001219,0.000294942,0.00006725754,0.0004353733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009591373,0.0001366635,0.00005823393,0.00122115,0.0009312569,0.0003061153,0.00003955045,0.0001233949,0.00001325481],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000145584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001191606,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003749043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002572743,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998353,0.00002560492,0.0003849511,0.0004716468,0.0003596251,0.0004051484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999253,0.00006093317,0.0001823103,0.0002773706,0.0001111542,0.0001152758],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006921408,0.00004942148,0.8966983,0.00201146,0.00001682536,0.000006922919,0.0001250643,0.001780964,0.08095232,0.0001774478,0.0002059198,0.01790613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008378199,0.0002802681,0.9203573,0.002439197,0.00009742194,0.00002274384,0.000376113,0.04305041,0.02843409,0.0008369429,0.002617877,0.0006497889],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9651463,0.004119225,0.0001341514,0.0001355818,0.0003741614,0.0002272435,0.00001182848,0.00004282055,0.02980871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882503,0.009072972,0.001718837,0.0003583814,0.00004573458,0.000003006835,0.000009191361,0.000002477949,0.0005391004],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05251823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5572976,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01082814189580696,"score_gpt":0.2572449309165326,"score_spread":0.2464167890207256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}