{"id":"W5053795","doi":"10.1139/y72-122","title":"Analysis and design of competing double auction marketplaces","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton; University of Southampton","keywords":"Bidding; Order (exchange); Double auction; Competition (biology); Business; Context (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Industrial organization; Microeconomics; Forward auction; Common value auction; Auction theory; Marketing; Economics; Computer science; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005011045,0.0008928938,0.001126112,0.0009956463,0.0008311353,0.00375055,0.002694742,0.001454309,0.008546007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01530967,0.0009280201,0.001424694,0.0008405985,0.001637986,0.003509992,0.002439886,0.001369794,0.0006830097],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001865803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002350218,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001839386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001360289,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956446,0.001593546,0.0002657955,0.0006938003,0.001206083,0.0005962196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916096,0.004776854,0.0009773957,0.0005505753,0.001351214,0.0007343825],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004529718,0.0003776551,0.003202268,0.0003823387,0.0001023239,0.0006564524,0.000407676,0.4757781,0.005454439,0.474876,0.001810341,0.03649956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006424167,0.0001582302,0.0001996607,0.00001354135,0.0000247494,0.00009153948,0.00008331848,0.9586572,0.0007439939,0.03833167,0.001613102,0.00001877388],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09044504,0.0003104036,0.8867078,0.0003162355,0.00007709215,0.0005642601,0.0001381654,0.0002036018,0.02123733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8336751,0.0003044961,0.1547217,0.00009813522,0.00004825722,0.0003978466,0.0001933408,0.00007949006,0.01048157],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008546007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02858919,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07052638970988942,"score_gpt":0.3745789989939274,"score_spread":0.304052609284038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}