{"id":"W57232450","doi":"10.2166/wqrj.2001.020","title":"A Canadian Perspective on Endocrine Disrupting Substances in the Environment","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Quality Research Journal","topic":"Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Health Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; Health Canada; Office of Science; Directorate for Biological Sciences; Shell Canada; Industry Canada; Canadian Food Inspection Agency; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; McMaster University; China National Tobacco Corporation; University of Pennsylvania; World Wildlife Fund; Trent University","keywords":"Stakeholder; Government (linguistics); Perspective (graphical); Political science; Resource (disambiguation); Environmental planning; Public relations; Public administration; Business; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005855949,0.0001381162,0.0001496729,0.000124961,0.000654596,0.0002010973,0.0006333506,0.00003262689,0.001977415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003101837,0.00006942003,0.00009849224,0.0002065459,0.0002770975,0.0001768882,0.0001208686,0.001157595,0.0006441566],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001577747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002720875,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1678154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06689464,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959759,0.001136281,0.0003032266,0.000308737,0.001150181,0.001125742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989489,0.0003939904,0.00003952372,0.0002887964,0.00002069811,0.0003081239],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004338794,0.001300194,0.8364195,0.00002647797,0.00009269355,0.006263445,0.05095081,0.002978594,0.06611236,0.004519949,0.008822557,0.02207951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004330488,0.001545725,0.4858607,0.0002753203,0.00002796805,0.002078061,0.08829678,0.00039925,0.03249669,0.08417615,0.2989605,0.001552359],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9540705,0.0001211232,0.000003751542,0.01849795,0.00003649588,0.0002116053,0.000003135433,0.000005760569,0.02704967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985408,0.0002288872,0.0000662047,0.0003171856,0.0001401093,0.00001924716,0.000002627971,0.00001108397,0.0006738285],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3505588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989349,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06939394605184931,"score_gpt":0.4528781144925594,"score_spread":0.3834841684407101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}