{"id":"W582837541","doi":"10.3138/9781442684898","title":"Empirical Gap in Jurisprudence: A Comprehensive Study of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Precedent; Majority opinion; Judicial opinion; Empirical research; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003702442,0.0003115801,0.0007876851,0.01308585,0.01859775,0.006450959,0.002172437,0.001324088,0.004939968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01800097,0.0004732127,0.0003751354,0.04213224,0.005046915,0.003119565,0.002419696,0.001855767,0.0002945497],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1508429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2068172,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9965797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988409,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947825,0.0005435423,0.0001728975,0.0004511656,0.003064053,0.0009857795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9788617,0.007420484,0.00116043,0.0004407146,0.009937156,0.002179433],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009544112,0.0002665654,0.3252862,0.001667604,0.0002633434,0.001809165,0.1773225,0.002143671,0.0004432607,0.221504,0.136015,0.1331834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001478431,0.00003099591,0.742717,0.001662533,0.0001293862,0.0002511534,0.1087436,0.001587622,0.0001790025,0.00742061,0.1371747,0.00008858497],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7753969,0.04400889,0.0009123716,0.02096721,0.0001671294,0.0002814574,0.01341494,0.00005873871,0.1447923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9749683,0.01267499,0.0009505311,0.001153835,0.00005129251,0.00007505785,0.002977813,0.00003856774,0.00710964],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8491572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9849019,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0693715708397739,"score_gpt":0.3457660307073014,"score_spread":0.2763944598675275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}