{"id":"W585617943","doi":"10.1007/s11056-015-9491-7","title":"Biochar and forest restoration: a review and meta-analysis of tree growth responses","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"New Forests","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":245,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biochar; Agroforestry; Tree (set theory); Forest restoration; Charcoal; Old-growth forest; Tree planting; Forestry; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology; Geography; Forest ecology; Chemistry; Ecosystem; Mathematics; Pyrolysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002808284,0.001273951,0.004246932,0.003100686,0.0002233011,0.001857314,0.001365815,0.001234122,0.002132827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005662579,0.000442358,0.003649389,0.004776426,0.0004877323,0.001266755,0.0008242579,0.001012835,0.000335487],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007354968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002866292,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002767707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00890429,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989784,0.0002134453,0.0002287798,0.0002562843,0.000265091,0.00005807897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961513,0.002612493,0.0006797155,0.0001398975,0.0003507134,0.0000659662],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007412287,0.0001761871,0.005458282,0.2277864,0.01756496,0.0001881157,0.0001656952,0.001362437,0.003834134,0.001047962,0.005065331,0.7366093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005280161,0.002162302,0.06795021,0.1209186,0.2080349,0.003221311,0.0008694894,0.001570263,0.007699548,0.007941409,0.5786707,0.0004332888],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008697228,0.9985298,0.0001678301,0.0001003446,0.00004200851,0.00000893936,0.0001058193,0.000004131411,0.0001713294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008377756,0.9901384,0.0007469563,0.0003645686,0.00008192634,0.00001530862,0.0001523228,0.000004411865,0.0001183396],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004246932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01485181,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09837009832178087,"score_gpt":0.3402943002053962,"score_spread":0.2419242018836153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}