{"id":"W598301463","doi":"10.1017/s0001924000009635","title":"A rating scale for the subjective assessment of simulation fidelity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Aeronautical Journal","topic":"Aerospace and Aviation Technology","field":"Engineering","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"Army Research Laboratory; Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; National Research Council Canada","keywords":"Fidelity; Rating scale; Task (project management); Scale (ratio); Flight simulator; Computer science; Simulation; Variety (cybernetics); Adaptation (eye); High fidelity; Operations research; Systems engineering; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01229395,0.0005257898,0.0004610092,0.002682761,0.0003705551,0.001185477,0.0007933469,0.0006762954,0.005089609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04949589,0.0002199731,0.0008651822,0.0009398817,0.0006275098,0.001664137,0.001554738,0.001047383,0.0008895569],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005340831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005325309,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006658092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001084445,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9862665,0.006035774,0.001735162,0.0004551991,0.005242044,0.0002653053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9431103,0.0268736,0.005688857,0.003779857,0.01847489,0.002072497],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003257731,0.001540765,0.2297845,0.002767449,0.000836273,0.000596548,0.01108132,0.01710229,0.05566902,0.01465028,0.03156264,0.6311512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005913324,0.01303422,0.7356511,0.001764108,0.0004689979,0.002777312,0.01441855,0.08221706,0.02290602,0.01117363,0.1138877,0.001109944],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.6046751,0.001652508,0.3354606,0.0007590869,0.0008104142,0.005837428,0.004051147,0.0013755,0.04537818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8423225,0.0006084226,0.1491455,0.0001889108,0.000126209,0.002653315,0.001820646,0.0001068351,0.003027649],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01229395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0650174,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01271263156744528,"score_gpt":0.2904434048879463,"score_spread":0.2777307733205011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}