{"id":"W600840809","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.005","title":"ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2208,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Population and Public Health","funders":"Monash University; Medical Research Council; National Institute for Health and Care Research; University of Alberta; Johns Hopkins University","keywords":"Systematic review; Psychological intervention; Relevance (law); Selection bias; Identification (biology); Scope (computer science); Psychology; Guideline; Medicine; MEDLINE; Process (computing); Risk analysis (engineering); Applied psychology; Computer science; Pathology; Nursing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_broad"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4836471,0.007455843,0.01737766,0.06598941,0.00363238,0.0166596,0.007448274,0.007189852,0.03134615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7247297,0.008442963,0.0459576,0.0389981,0.005781677,0.02245023,0.02245833,0.01181139,0.006700374],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01798228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04157077,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002827663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004534343,"domain_scores_codex":[0.3009768,0.4480001,0.182606,0.01361904,0.05259984,0.002198105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1276848,0.7164125,0.06010553,0.02393922,0.06966841,0.002189565],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004407237,0.0002334282,0.0111982,0.3410204,0.05219465,0.0004339927,0.005270161,0.006198321,0.0008764264,0.03905424,0.1188236,0.4202893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01374897,0.002396159,0.020377,0.2480826,0.06358474,0.002574517,0.002800013,0.02966239,0.004370533,0.1052828,0.5048149,0.002305446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.006198457,0.06139457,0.6357213,0.01508899,0.008512688,0.1662969,0.06406426,0.023439,0.01928387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01705915,0.007319977,0.7476189,0.001932733,0.0006745576,0.2176137,0.005014516,0.001378656,0.001387793],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9826223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.636755,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9813208922076017,"score_gpt":0.7157097203841251,"score_spread":0.2656111718234766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}