{"id":"W600840809","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.005","title":"ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2208,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Population and Public Health","funders":"Monash University; Medical Research Council; National Institute for Health and Care Research; University of Alberta; Johns Hopkins University","keywords":"Systematic review; Psychological intervention; Relevance (law); Selection bias; Identification (biology); Scope (computer science); Psychology; Guideline; Medicine; MEDLINE; Process (computing); Risk analysis (engineering); Applied psychology; Computer science; Pathology; Nursing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9813208922076017,"score_gpt":0.7157097203841251,"score_spread":0.2656111718234766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}