{"id":"W605004882","doi":"","title":"Optimal Spatiotemporal Evacuation Demand Management: Methodology and Case Study in Toronto","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transportation Research Board 88th Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board","topic":"Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Emergency evacuation; Computer science; Operations research; Downtown; Scheduling (production processes); Process (computing); Emergency management; Destinations; Control (management); Demand patterns; Transport engineering; Demand management; Operations management; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Tourism; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004062434,0.0006418678,0.000276946,0.0006174069,0.0009850134,0.0007807356,0.0009495988,0.001088301,0.001941157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001028399,0.0002482959,0.0004077839,0.001735699,0.0008471669,0.000335159,0.0007025368,0.0003653987,0.00008990667],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009262371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004236721,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.623531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6934457,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997435,0.00008429328,0.00001253673,0.00003484088,0.00004155818,0.00008322165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995952,0.0002293173,0.00004000457,0.0000202864,0.00006249194,0.00005271918],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001306215,0.0001414283,0.007984738,0.0001330969,0.00002975608,0.001880315,0.0004454421,0.970553,0.001386258,0.006281058,0.001358245,0.00967605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004521963,0.0001361558,0.009837281,0.00002342139,0.00003416157,0.000107726,0.002194352,0.9827943,0.001312857,0.001164558,0.002319137,0.00003077638],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9558989,0.0003400607,0.02738858,0.0005064657,0.00001866229,0.0003201513,0.001327979,0.0001036904,0.01409553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840397,0.0003747904,0.01234805,0.00001890511,0.000006685804,0.00007810778,0.0003818025,0.00001365056,0.00273827],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.376469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7573721,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08103571180105408,"score_gpt":0.4201712469496546,"score_spread":0.3391355351486005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}