{"id":"W613960602","doi":"10.1016/j.tcs.2015.06.019","title":"The decidability of the intensional fragment of classical linear logic","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Computer Science","topic":"Logic, programming, and type systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Decidability; Fragment (logic); Substructural logic; Mathematics; Sequent calculus; Linear logic; Sequent; Intermediate logic; Linear temporal logic; Propositional calculus; Natural deduction; Discrete mathematics; Zeroth-order logic; Algorithm; Programming language; Computer science; Description logic; Multimodal logic; Mathematical proof","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004207167,0.0006430746,0.0008969201,0.00128261,0.002090169,0.006428255,0.003825212,0.001574439,0.006663883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0117944,0.001146393,0.002203225,0.001461759,0.007527423,0.01505163,0.002804071,0.009225269,0.0006341418],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00514004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002681446,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005647058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003863865,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965696,0.0009427087,0.0001727596,0.0009327073,0.0008294603,0.000552752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846873,0.01225485,0.0006258888,0.001082781,0.0008930822,0.00045615],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002140825,0.00008306443,0.0006761588,0.000146852,0.00004317026,0.0001489534,0.0007858322,0.00254188,0.001593776,0.9807099,0.00243736,0.01061894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000585435,0.0000216139,0.0003634293,0.00003282809,0.00004343511,0.0001088843,0.0001316335,0.01471146,0.002493286,0.9791074,0.002904731,0.00002272032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4380279,0.004792174,0.4120711,0.01705506,0.000582962,0.0001701984,0.001874424,0.001663829,0.1237624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9553127,0.0007652926,0.02902912,0.001141626,0.0005702683,0.00008466102,0.001071033,0.0001712321,0.01185387],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006663883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03729373,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03056628056634667,"score_gpt":0.2724491367975593,"score_spread":0.2418828562312126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}