{"id":"W619974427","doi":"","title":"Indian Department Headquarters Records, 1844–1861: A Case Study in Recordkeeping and Archival Custody","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archivaria (Association of Canadian Archivists)","topic":"Digital and Traditional Archives Management","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Records management; Bureaucracy; National archives; Humanities; Governor; History; Political science; Ethnology; Library science; Law; Art; Politics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003691052,0.0002555902,0.0003580349,0.001576243,0.0003364107,0.0002819122,0.0002082557,0.00001433896,0.0001318465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006972875,0.0002689589,0.0000970537,0.0001744492,0.0001528223,0.0004405465,0.0000781652,0.0002661823,0.0000904503],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002149469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001912771,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3582722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6695058,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997732,0.0002642758,0.0006272803,0.0004225804,0.0003262773,0.0006275311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998561,0.0004627213,0.0002483492,0.0002373851,0.00004718216,0.0004433625],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006407121,0.001136722,0.06032219,0.000175076,0.0006246425,0.001723732,0.1756538,0.00004010117,0.00001142261,0.55698,0.01078956,0.1924787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001676374,0.0006804617,0.7973631,0.0001225504,0.00006506996,0.00008780396,0.01087047,0.0004170627,0.000001558778,0.151932,0.03614483,0.0006386825],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6968136,0.000003352153,0.000009059601,0.001730097,0.0002022737,0.0009595956,0.000229646,0.00002748335,0.3000248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964536,0.00001462863,0.0003770501,0.0005413576,0.0001589008,0.0001955426,0.0001270932,0.00003031788,0.002101483],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7370409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999763,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01731832139296994,"score_gpt":0.2030550729768058,"score_spread":0.1857367515838359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}