{"id":"W621660085","doi":"10.1016/j.compchemeng.2015.05.028","title":"A new method to detect and quantify correlated alarms with occurrence delays","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Chemical Engineering","topic":"Fault Detection and Control Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"ALARM; Correlation; False alarm; Correlation coefficient; Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient; Computer science; Algorithm; Pattern recognition (psychology); Data mining; Mathematics; Statistics; Real-time computing; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001071229,0.0002179239,0.0002580236,0.00009458203,0.00001366667,0.00005886697,0.0001383569,0.00009442044,0.000003060344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002710269,0.0002044801,0.00003330646,0.0003077055,0.000006847398,0.00007836885,0.00004228179,0.0002363579,0.00002163375],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007485271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001699489,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002426798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.55839e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991303,0.000009082847,0.0001901937,0.0002355385,0.0001512824,0.0002836036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992144,0.00007139961,0.00001544496,0.000162884,0.00003018012,0.0005057539],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004049805,0.000003384968,0.00002756153,0.00006732649,0.00009407299,0.00002243763,0.0004490108,0.818525,0.1062134,0.00004152929,0.002543933,0.07197182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007854771,0.00006139627,0.00002468961,0.0001024544,0.00001699685,0.0001416322,0.00001486818,0.9687575,0.02196924,0.000007584212,0.00780128,0.0003169559],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05371453,0.0003370012,0.9444609,0.00003527501,0.0005084057,0.00014931,0.000002685656,0.0007245567,0.00006729623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8289296,0.000002030368,0.1708344,0.0000458234,0.0001202243,0.00001666365,0.000003599846,0.00003642101,0.00001127708],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7752151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8338456,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0109414576546376,"score_gpt":0.2280329729143149,"score_spread":0.2170915152596773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}