{"id":"W626713927","doi":"","title":"HOUSEHOLDS' DEFAULT PROBABILITY: AN ANALYSIS BASED ON THE RESULTS OF THE HFCS*","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Bulletin and Financial Stability Report Articles","topic":"Italy: Economic History and Contemporary Issues","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Probability of default; Consumption (sociology); Quarter (Canadian coin); Economics; Debt; Household debt; Default; Credit risk; Portuguese; Financial stability; Distribution (mathematics); Econometrics; Survey data collection; Business; Actuarial science; Financial system; Finance; Statistics; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002361346,0.0002133025,0.0004284063,0.003146782,0.0003127687,0.0007557854,0.0004167338,0.0005264713,0.003003549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007985342,0.0001069792,0.0009458659,0.00207655,0.0003599368,0.0004623351,0.0005580186,0.0003787143,0.0004248474],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006853013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002481508,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02708909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01062881,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987887,0.0005473076,0.00008133361,0.000154042,0.0002391029,0.0001895794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919996,0.004973625,0.001318417,0.0004926655,0.0008293656,0.0003863215],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001921556,0.00005265223,0.982419,0.00002755076,0.0001519305,0.0002394735,0.0003635001,0.006686605,0.0001568493,0.001020077,0.001159706,0.007530591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008839326,0.0001490885,0.9732785,0.00001589297,0.00007900323,0.0002829905,0.0006697894,0.02366082,0.000175628,0.0004829525,0.001176828,0.00001954209],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927753,0.0001964413,0.002341471,0.0001052044,0.000006331957,0.00002867395,0.002202631,0.00002364865,0.002320235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974279,0.00007358422,0.0004470766,0.00001100515,0.00001194077,0.00001497827,0.001526094,0.000004464056,0.0004829496],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02708909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05386281,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04484963359298023,"score_gpt":0.2025682005404651,"score_spread":0.1577185669474849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}