{"id":"W626713927","doi":"","title":"HOUSEHOLDS' DEFAULT PROBABILITY: AN ANALYSIS BASED ON THE RESULTS OF THE HFCS*","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Bulletin and Financial Stability Report Articles","topic":"Italy: Economic History and Contemporary Issues","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Probability of default; Consumption (sociology); Quarter (Canadian coin); Economics; Debt; Household debt; Default; Credit risk; Portuguese; Financial stability; Distribution (mathematics); Econometrics; Survey data collection; Business; Actuarial science; Financial system; Finance; Statistics; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004129612,0.0002113863,0.0005659436,0.00007754726,0.0003133046,0.0000568474,0.0003299208,0.0001161128,0.0006971686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007524804,0.0001646155,0.0003203166,0.0001801499,0.0004523479,0.000198899,0.00008858475,0.000178342,0.00009887491],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001753249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006602128,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001342718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004492293,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997518,0.0001211234,0.001350489,0.0006076889,0.00004684704,0.0003558756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997493,0.0002340717,0.0007776495,0.001336541,0.00002708273,0.0001316126],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002242146,0.0004753462,0.9446315,0.00002254547,0.00007966121,0.000001827517,0.002384212,0.0004992571,0.0000236638,0.05011269,0.00104974,0.0004953023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006935056,0.0001413656,0.7746412,0.0000106846,0.00007880621,0.000006522588,0.0003730828,0.003089906,0.001273992,0.01074123,0.208508,0.0004417756],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9853208,0.0003055213,0.0000879951,0.00381791,0.0003506161,0.0004106975,0.0002161955,0.00003266731,0.009457604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990084,0.000005870724,0.0001173015,0.0004150094,0.0001311247,0.00004703139,0.00001172124,0.00001623329,0.0002472984],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2074582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7633507,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04484963359298023,"score_gpt":0.2025682005404651,"score_spread":0.1577185669474849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}