{"id":"W630838559","doi":"10.1590/s0102-311x2012000600020","title":"An argument for explicit rationing of health resources within the public-private mix in Brazil Um argumento a favor da racionalização explícita de recursos de saúde no sistema misto público-privado no Brasil","year":2012,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Public Health in Brazil","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Rationing; Welfare economics; Health care; Political science; Economics; Humanities; Philosophy; Medicine; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04617562,0.0008937858,0.002150301,0.001589939,0.002741556,0.00381307,0.008350905,0.0005375798,0.003130412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008296696,0.0008066392,0.0005009986,0.003261922,0.0006672491,0.00819818,0.001220772,0.001202668,0.00003442616],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00275692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00410557,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008706839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002610323,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9801884,0.00801089,0.004684042,0.001203581,0.00287534,0.003037721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857224,0.002783772,0.006449559,0.001574578,0.001352523,0.002117207],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001088878,0.003723438,0.7844588,0.002062705,0.0006165268,0.00001098289,0.08875261,0.0003191906,0.01394908,0.01228723,0.08002797,0.01270264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004549483,0.0003599088,0.4743904,0.00513157,0.0002309141,0.00004217803,0.0221082,0.003076797,0.004410042,0.006477508,0.4768421,0.002380876],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9431165,0.02076302,0.002496791,0.02225153,0.002720296,0.005143493,0.0002744555,0.00009292789,0.00314098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839537,0.004774814,0.0022002,0.005493333,0.001213965,0.0008759839,0.00006888389,0.0001752291,0.001243891],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3968142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994385,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2977550386271759,"score_gpt":0.5654483575810784,"score_spread":0.2676933189539024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}