{"id":"W633381425","doi":"10.34382/00002581","title":"Philippine English : a case of language drift","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Linguistic Variation and Morphology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Linguistics; First language; Scrutiny; Foreign language; Language transfer; Indigenization; Norm (philosophy); English studies; Test of English as a Foreign Language; English language; Sociology; History; Political science; Language education; Computer science; Comprehension approach; Pedagogy; Artificial intelligence; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005698508,0.0001004103,0.0001493718,0.00007888795,0.0006188694,0.00004933077,0.0002019748,0.0001185418,0.000665848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007403086,0.0000989777,0.00005683367,0.0002398679,0.0007430884,0.0002708088,0.00008608705,0.0002432065,0.00001819106],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004794166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007940368,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01237735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009926607,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988366,0.00007917966,0.000296715,0.0002345599,0.0003414747,0.0002115113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985991,0.0002025153,0.0001376019,0.0003411106,0.0005651948,0.000154453],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002463135,0.0001195346,0.001210185,0.00001759968,0.00002579942,0.001896157,0.01451368,0.000003697025,0.01070074,0.9696149,0.001277291,0.0005958035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006277948,0.0000337981,0.0005602469,0.0000331437,0.00004971217,0.0007376871,0.005004622,0.00003138556,0.006097736,0.0004392673,0.986139,0.0002456243],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.820345,0.0001122258,0.001721212,0.0005938745,0.01854293,0.0003115991,0.0007461197,0.0002126983,0.1574144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914826,0.000009383222,0.003187769,0.0001072924,0.004004416,0.00001509383,0.0001798097,0.000006316575,0.001007386],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9848617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9941993,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01361532116700442,"score_gpt":0.3105306294905887,"score_spread":0.2969153083235843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}