{"id":"W636298290","doi":"","title":"Innovative Method for Interpreting Ground-Penetrating Radar (GPR) Data from Concrete Bridge Decks","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board","topic":"Geophysical Methods and Applications","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ground-penetrating radar; Bridge (graph theory); Rebar; Context (archaeology); Bridge deck; Nondestructive testing; Radar; Delamination (geology); Engineering; Structural engineering; Forensic engineering; Computer science; Civil engineering; Geology; Deck; Seismology; Telecommunications","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006104442,0.0005638379,0.0003071036,0.001767973,0.0001718623,0.0006292378,0.0004915189,0.0005441015,0.0007333534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001008907,0.0002406479,0.0002729112,0.001137109,0.000217576,0.0005441541,0.0004645399,0.0003536427,0.0004919457],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000201962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006528097,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009364247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001588754,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995071,0.000110001,0.00003057798,0.0001099233,0.000210464,0.00003190791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994403,0.0001497124,0.00007752222,0.00006021669,0.0002497398,0.00002249575],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001700174,0.0001219804,0.006640188,0.000244595,0.00006371952,0.0003285129,0.0002698995,0.006222085,0.6091292,0.001513159,0.001001323,0.3742953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009409318,0.0007157225,0.04922618,0.00008100161,0.0002123693,0.003680119,0.0005538423,0.431798,0.4962318,0.001543537,0.01568927,0.0001740482],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.05649385,0.0002113371,0.9405838,0.00004494681,0.00003870037,0.0001183215,0.0001873563,0.0009570183,0.001364644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1886714,0.0002760206,0.8094455,0.00003894722,0.00003101476,0.0001464425,0.0002378072,0.00004971899,0.001103239],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001767973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003228366,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1070135133201924,"score_gpt":0.4311867381011558,"score_spread":0.3241732247809634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}