{"id":"W658619875","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511806544","title":"Fallacies and Argument Appraisal","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Argument (complex analysis); Rhetorical question; Dialectic; Epistemology; Identification (biology); Critical appraisal; Order (exchange); Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Medicine; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03487708,0.001351776,0.001593293,0.00882455,0.007178247,0.02089413,0.00259059,0.007331449,0.008627151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1093474,0.0007012676,0.0008052127,0.004461665,0.04497279,0.02606333,0.009569907,0.01161485,0.001976779],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01051592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006692214,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001172635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001375523,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9285039,0.04777323,0.003738767,0.002984162,0.01479589,0.002204084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9223148,0.06220912,0.003288925,0.002387625,0.008633925,0.0011656],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001259684,0.00001065454,0.0001067114,0.0002026386,0.000006679657,0.0001189753,0.009595892,0.0001511074,0.00008160927,0.9553612,0.01267397,0.02167782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006205646,0.00001160191,0.0001213143,0.0009046672,0.000004072589,0.0001213023,0.00735785,0.0004384535,0.0001458128,0.8622828,0.1285882,0.00001771785],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01717287,0.06397595,0.1900093,0.1638503,0.01450151,0.001298538,0.0001908517,0.0004437553,0.5485569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6636479,0.03240369,0.1829449,0.0192765,0.00651039,0.002233192,0.0004068892,0.0006404649,0.09193604],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03487708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1844498,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04932347582373089,"score_gpt":0.2372899933934233,"score_spread":0.1879665175696924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}