{"id":"W6887733874","doi":"10.17605/osf.io/2tbk7","title":"Librarian involvement in systematic reviews and quality of reported search strategies: evidence from Vancouver, BC","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Systematic review; Quality (philosophy); Service (business); Measure (data warehouse); Quality assessment; Service quality","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1008741,0.0005900816,0.002910577,0.01127841,0.004244615,0.01336748,0.003928787,0.001879135,0.01330302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4847702,0.001953761,0.001487746,0.03129872,0.002438914,0.00477151,0.006570139,0.002561838,0.001743479],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06019246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1673757,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8741201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9457133,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7768349,0.106585,0.04430264,0.006946542,0.05648724,0.008843699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3372355,0.3603152,0.08687485,0.01914763,0.164346,0.03208077],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003733285,0.0005348254,0.3894471,0.06532314,0.005360804,0.0004794231,0.02102001,0.0005021758,0.0006043593,0.003000089,0.06367757,0.4463172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002323446,0.0005784719,0.6967427,0.1104529,0.006169081,0.0008296716,0.0208633,0.001096376,0.0007700372,0.001345297,0.1584564,0.0003722098],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3453321,0.4004644,0.005183926,0.08719615,0.001625941,0.005861204,0.02156221,0.0005440433,0.13223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.849476,0.1047203,0.00901814,0.01361934,0.0003792901,0.003542375,0.006592856,0.000340572,0.01231099],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8991259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5334798,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1291417395304015,"score_gpt":0.3458457088706277,"score_spread":0.2167039693402262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}