{"id":"W6888902252","doi":"10.23687/ec9e2659-1c29-4ddb-87a2-6aced147a990","title":"Species composition, forest properties and land cover types across Canada’s forests at 250m resolution for 2001 and 2011","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"GEOSCAN","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Raster graphics; Forest inventory; Polygon (computer graphics); Land cover; Forest cover; Cover (algebra); Forest management; Data set; Classification of discontinuities; Raster data","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000450357,0.0006942324,0.0004859359,0.005417046,0.00220765,0.001332458,0.001132587,0.0002679144,0.01047598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001530337,0.0003741928,0.0005594034,0.01166832,0.0003219592,0.0005197307,0.0005965672,0.0007529505,0.00299145],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0199122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0348651,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9951316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976256,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992023,0.00001793093,0.0000377542,0.0001020181,0.0004635402,0.0001763889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967235,0.00006741613,0.0001505057,0.0001146946,0.002725692,0.0002182328],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002882369,0.00009875069,0.1745326,0.00121104,0.0002878793,0.0003004978,0.001234572,0.002780442,0.00154498,0.002295702,0.719718,0.09570735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002322768,0.00001170486,0.7460486,0.0002055361,0.00006480186,0.0001052864,0.001145492,0.0008400956,0.0005400488,0.0001714841,0.2507765,0.00006729639],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","genre_scores_codex":[0.026455,0.0005921831,0.0004221832,0.000191579,0.00004068082,0.00008793159,0.9629413,0.0002092437,0.009059908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07189112,0.001209535,0.0034167,0.000142751,0.00002125706,0.0001367026,0.905357,0.0001047217,0.01772016],"genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0199122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1444738,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04027737357461277,"score_gpt":0.2658539081946333,"score_spread":0.2255765346200205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}