{"id":"W6893515812","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.15735864","title":"Fugitive Frames: Nomadic semiotics in image analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Semiotics; Focus (optics); Politics; Sociology of culture; Visual methods; Cultural studies; Image (mathematics)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01091149,0.0002772512,0.00111063,0.00314186,0.0005645583,0.00187579,0.003871943,0.0002133182,0.009462263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008536726,0.0002765008,0.0003267966,0.01004056,0.0009570076,0.002580623,0.001107339,0.0007853503,0.00002927648],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005724316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001113047,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009038957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037857,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9930969,0.003013577,0.001039262,0.0005803193,0.001370648,0.0008992951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948281,0.002859242,0.0005499766,0.0005649924,0.0007005667,0.0004971463],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001335045,0.0004821644,0.9654385,0.00005120188,0.0007604251,0.00008209455,0.002584842,0.0001444163,0.0117246,0.002641698,0.008078774,0.007877722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000407614,0.00001043758,0.9444748,0.0003023492,0.0002943776,2.572517e-7,0.002352326,0.0004073372,0.008832566,0.03187875,0.01068202,0.0003571787],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9058935,0.006356827,0.005859944,0.0006401472,0.000424563,0.0007391561,0.00004646993,0.0000515723,0.07998779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99106,0.00486779,0.001450944,0.0003594679,0.000109356,0.00006116346,0.000004817246,0.00002471071,0.00206181],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08516642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999687,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7189424547785911,"score_gpt":0.7755117236261424,"score_spread":0.05656926884755131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}