{"id":"W6902385901","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.7052345.v1","title":"MOESM1 of Climate change mitigation in Canadaâ s forest sector: a spatially explicit case study for two regions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Climate change mitigation; Greenhouse gas; Vegetation (pathology); Global warming","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006873679,0.0003943192,0.000284188,0.001458799,0.0008175674,0.0009270144,0.001863409,0.0005068122,0.09398171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003485696,0.0002045808,0.0005549105,0.003184289,0.0001911502,0.0004238108,0.000539877,0.0005265993,0.004390329],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005613565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008348251,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9460841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9666412,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997361,0.0000315629,0.00001274763,0.00003525578,0.00009511831,0.00008914293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863,0.0004218709,0.00009317313,0.00009302884,0.000598369,0.000163498],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002050427,0.0001064615,0.04230766,0.0007982819,0.0001260826,0.0002737267,0.0003116163,0.02524107,0.000234306,0.003046143,0.910601,0.0167485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008361374,0.00009158714,0.3489062,0.0009889908,0.0001952888,0.0001934822,0.005168004,0.05660656,0.001603621,0.002435701,0.5828078,0.0001665615],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01234084,0.00006206522,0.0003522069,0.0003209852,0.00002270995,0.000102633,0.9776513,0.0002767826,0.008870543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2015536,0.0002885965,0.009669649,0.0002149182,0.00002449442,0.0005356514,0.7594612,0.0004391506,0.02781269],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09398171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3144001,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1036070561316804,"score_gpt":0.2676751302609698,"score_spread":0.1640680741292894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}