{"id":"W6904689077","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0308111.s015","title":"Quality assessment of retrospective studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quality assessment; Quality (philosophy); Retrospective cohort study; Risk assessment; MEDLINE","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2903305,0.001898195,0.01035153,0.01903328,0.002156043,0.004992547,0.004319099,0.002047028,0.006456206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5454764,0.001536087,0.0290348,0.01711534,0.002976573,0.004587064,0.004123583,0.002668583,0.0005397214],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004667477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01014434,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007834859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01445758,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5785494,0.1196138,0.2546009,0.01424335,0.03162725,0.001365335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3151236,0.4466283,0.1309198,0.04656325,0.05830188,0.002463217],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.009818427,0.0001612192,0.1238661,0.547568,0.1789733,0.0003144116,0.00383266,0.002854829,0.001505765,0.005504449,0.01960249,0.1059983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01145235,0.003603773,0.3055008,0.1876873,0.3214201,0.001851323,0.003616625,0.0102511,0.004800988,0.02786497,0.1202979,0.001652824],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.06527324,0.5618361,0.1749895,0.005572873,0.004467935,0.07636254,0.09717231,0.001432146,0.0128933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5684845,0.06198561,0.1930852,0.00266758,0.001088503,0.1347586,0.03475539,0.000601361,0.002573312],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7096695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8751489,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9386744464339128,"score_gpt":0.6659209611902045,"score_spread":0.2727534852437083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}