{"id":"W6904765361","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0294461.s003","title":"Assessing the quality of studies and evaluating the risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Quality assessment; Risk assessment; Quality assurance; Data quality","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3108307,0.002168201,0.01035934,0.01776513,0.002215138,0.005068556,0.005371745,0.003615117,0.01057749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6503955,0.001905615,0.0238226,0.01513518,0.004539821,0.005506469,0.005028583,0.004886848,0.001234457],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009228433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02556626,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01571897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0255696,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5404498,0.171419,0.2286249,0.01254279,0.04567195,0.001291546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.230233,0.5102109,0.1174139,0.03476097,0.104882,0.002499286],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003885529,0.000276065,0.03871098,0.5139637,0.1078799,0.000228244,0.003180784,0.002267695,0.001588212,0.0103254,0.08449758,0.2331959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01204506,0.002357326,0.1378223,0.3811958,0.1620415,0.00104805,0.002324015,0.01369661,0.005950608,0.0507347,0.228415,0.002369087],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01966137,0.4256747,0.2118952,0.02437614,0.005951245,0.1760344,0.1144227,0.002077326,0.0199069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.184753,0.07180405,0.4593663,0.005419002,0.001292624,0.2386766,0.03342679,0.0007943122,0.004467321],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6891693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8498684,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9787893476628472,"score_gpt":0.7347390470083504,"score_spread":0.2440503006544968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}